ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Efficacy of donepezil in patients with chronic tinnitus.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTinnitus is any perception of sound that occurs in the absence of an external auditory stimulus. Donepezil, commonly prescribed for dementia, has not yet been evaluated in individuals with tinnitus. By increasing synaptic availability of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter widely distributed in the central nervous system and potentially neuroprotective against glutamate induced excitotoxicity, donepezil may offer a pharmacological approach for the management of this condition. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a double-blind, prospective, randomized controlled trial with a sample of 35 each in a chronic subjective, non-somatosensory tinnitus group and an age- and gender-matched control group. Participants received either donepezil or a placebo for 3-months. Treatment effects were monitored using scales and questionnaires: THI, VAS, CDR, MMSE; and psychoacoustic measurements of tinnitus.
resultsNo statistically significant difference in symptom improvement was observed between the donepezil and placebo groups as assessed by the evaluation instruments. Notably, analysis of confidence intervals for patients achieving a minimum improvement of ≥ 7 and ≥ 11-points in THI scores suggested a potential clinically meaningful trend favoring donepezil. Additionally, complete remission of tinnitus was observed in a single patient, occurring only in the donepezil group.
conclusionIn the present double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, no statistically significant difference was identified between the groups regarding the primary outcome. However, the donepezil-treated group demonstrated better performance than the placebo group, and a possible indication of greater clinical benefit was observed in the treatment group in those using amplification, suggesting a potential therapeutic relevance, but larger, more in-depth studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.