ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Development and validation of machine learning models to predict 30-day mortality in patients with cardiac arrest complicated by acute kidney injury.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac Arrest (CA) often leads to Acute Kidney Injury (AKI), presenting a major health issue. This study aims to develop and validate machine learning models predicting 30-day mortality in CA patients with AKI.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 1,121 adult ICU patients diagnosed with CA and AKI using data from the MIMIC-IV database. Data from 2008‒2016 (n = 900) formed the training cohort, while 2017‒2019 data (n = 221) served as the temporal validation cohort. Feature selection utilized LASSO regression, followed by the application of six machine learning algorithms. Model performance was evaluated using ROC curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis, with comparisons made against the APACHE II and SOFA scores.
resultsSeven key features were identified, namely, APACHE II score, lactate, anion gap, RDW, oliguria, norepinephrine, and temporary pacemaker implantation. The LASSO-Logistic Regression (LASSO-LR) model demonstrated the most stable performance in validation (AUROC = 0.751), significantly outperforming APACHE II (0.583, p < 0.001) and SOFA (0.660, p = 0.009), with a Brier score of 0.209. SHAP analysis revealed oliguria and RDW as the most significant predictors.
conclusionsThe LASSO-LR model offers a modest but statistically significant improvement over conventional scoring systems for predicting 30-day mortality in patients with CA and AKI, with acceptable calibration and interpretability. However, the clinical meaningfulness of this incremental benefit requires prospective validation before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.