Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42710026›Full record

ArticleThe American Journal of dermatopathology2026

Long-Term Outcomes Support Utilization of 23-GEP in Clinically Ambiguous Melanocytic Neoplasms.

Kavenpreet S Bal, Nikita J Patel, Leandra Doan, Sophia Liang, David S Cassarino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American Journal of dermatopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kavenpreet S BalKaiser Permanente, Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA.
Nikita J PatelKaiser Permanente, Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA.
Leandra DoanLoma Linda University Health, Dermatology Residency, Loma Linda, CA.
Sophia LiangUniversity of Washington, Anatomic and Clinical Pathology Residency, Seattle, WA; and.
David S CassarinoLos Angeles Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-8875-0858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractDifficult-to-diagnose melanocytic neoplasms often require additional diagnostic tools beyond histopathological assessment to reach a definitive diagnosis. The 23-gene expression profile (GEP) test provides additional diagnostic information, returning a result of suggestive of benign , intermediate , or suggestive of malignant . Here, we present a real-world cohort of ambiguous melanocytic lesions where the 23-GEP test was used to arrive at a definitive diagnosis with long-term follow-up. Melanocytic lesions were included in this study if 23-GEP testing was performed as part of their original diagnostic workup (n = 267). Long-term follow-up to determine disease recurrence and/or metastasis (ie, an event) was obtained (median, 6 years). Following 23-GEP testing, 89.5% of difficult-to-diagnose lesions were provided definitive diagnoses. Event rates were 11.5% for lesions with malignant 23-GEP results, 2.9% for lesions with intermediate results, and 1.3% for lesions with benign results (Fisher exact, P = 0.002). Lesions with at least 5 years of clinical follow-up and/or an event (n = 163) had similar results to the overall cohort ( P = 0.007). A benign 23-GEP result is associated with a low risk of recurrence/metastasis, whereas a malignant 23-GEP result is associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence/metastasis, supporting the value of 23-GEP in guiding clinical management decisions for ambiguous melanocytic lesions.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGene Expression ProfilingMelanomaSkin NeoplasmsTranscriptomeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPredictive Value of TestsTime FactorsBiomarkers, Tumorambiguousgene expression profilemelanomaMyPath

Identifiers

PMID42710026
PMCPMC13680773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.