ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2026
A Unified Scale for Interpreting Quantitative Measurements Across Distributions.
Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuantitative measurements are commonly interpreted using raw values, standardised scores, or interval-based summaries. However, these approaches do not provide a unified and directly interpretable representation of how observations relate to their underlying variability, particularly across variables with different scales and distributional forms.
objectiveThis paper introduces a dispersion-based transformation, termed the Dispersion-Based Value (DBV), which expresses observed values on a continuous and direction-sensitive scale relative to their dispersion structure. Building on standardised deviation, the DBV framework maps values onto a bounded interpretive scale defined by a reference dispersion limit, enabling consistent classification of deviation magnitude across variables and analytical contexts.
methodsThrough illustrative and data-informed examples, the proposed representation is shown to preserve the structure of standardised deviation while enhancing interpretability, particularly for extreme observations. The framework is compatible with classical statistical practice and can be implemented using standard measures of central tendency and dispersion, including mean-standard deviation, median-interquartile range and transformation-based approaches.
conclusionBy embedding deviation within a unified and scalable interpretive space, the DBV framework provides a structured tool for improving clarity, comparability and communication of quantitative measurements. While the formulation is general and potentially applicable across diverse domains, its use depends on appropriate specification of reference parameters and context-specific validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.