Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709962›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

AI-Assisted Adaptation of the Swedish Version of the Digital Competencies for Applied Psychological Practitioners Scale: Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation.

Kristofer Vernmark, Simon Lai, Alesia Moulton-Perkins, Helen Pote

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristofer VernmarkDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Campus Valla, Olaus Magnus väg 37, Linköping, Östergötland, 581 83, Sweden, 46 733211074.ORCID 0000-0003-4250-8868
Simon LaiDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0004-8916-0621
Alesia Moulton-PerkinsOxford Institute of Clinical Psychology Training and Research, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1820-9753
Helen PoteDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8551-1931

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As digital technologies become increasingly integrated into psychological practice, the demand for competencies in digital clinical psychology is growing. Although competency frameworks for digital clinical practice exist, validated instruments to assess these competencies remain scarce. In Sweden, psychology master's students are now being offered digital psychology courses, increasing the need for instruments to measure intended improvements in knowledge and abilities. Using AI to assist with translation procedures can facilitate the adaptation of existing instruments to new national and cultural contexts. Objective: This study aims to test an AI-assisted procedure for the translation and contextual adaptation of the Digital Competencies for Applied Psychological Practitioners (DCAPP) scale into Swedish and to examine the psychometric properties of the translated version in a sample of psychology master's students in Sweden, including a pilot test of the instrument's responsiveness to changes in knowledge and abilities among students attending a digital psychology course. Methods: An AI-assisted adaptation procedure, using ChatGPT and DeepL, was used to translate the DCAPP from English to Swedish. The Swedish version was distributed to psychology master's students during their eighth semester, including those attending an elective digital psychology course. Twenty-four of 55 master's students completed the baseline questionnaire. Of the 14 students enrolled in the digital psychology course, 13 completed the baseline questionnaire and 9 completed the follow-up assessment. Item descriptives, internal consistency, and responsiveness to change were calculated for the scale. Results: The AI-assisted translation procedure resulted in a translated version of the scale with both high quality and semantic similarity ratings. The Swedish DCAPP demonstrated excellent internal consistency for the total score (α=.96) and also for Knowledge (α=.93) and Abilities (α=.96) subscales. It demonstrated acceptable item distributions, with item-total correlations above 0.30 (range: 0.53-0.87), and mean interitem correlations for the subscales were acceptable but indicated potential item redundancy (Knowledge Conclusions: Using an AI-assisted adaptation procedure to support translation is feasible. The Swedish DCAPP showed promising psychometric properties and preliminary evidence of responsiveness to change. Floor effects may have been due to students' limited digital competencies. Although initial results are promising, further research with larger samples is needed before the psychometric validity of the Swedish DCAPP can be confirmed.

Indexed as

PsychometricsAdultFemaleHumansMalePsychologistsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenTranslatingAIclinical psychologycross-cultural adaptationdigital competenciesdigital mental healthinstrument translationpsychologistspsychology studentspsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID42709962
PMCPMC13552648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.