Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709921›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Seaweed carbon removal cannot keep up with climate-driven loss.

Karen Filbee-Dexter, Albert Pessarrodona, Kira A Krumhansl, Thomas Wernberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen Filbee-DexterUWA Oceans Institute & School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8413-6797
Albert PessarrodonaUWA Oceans Institute & School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Kira A KrumhanslBedford Institute of Oceanography, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Thomas WernbergUWA Oceans Institute & School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevailing narrative of seaweed carbon as a possible climate change mitigation solution overlooks the central challenge that climate change itself is adversely impacting seaweed forests worldwide, potentially shifting these ecosystems from carbon sinks to carbon sources. In this Essay, we show that climate-induced seaweed forest loss is eroding their carbon sink capacity three to four orders of magnitude (1,000-10,000×) faster than it can currently be restored or recovered through active interventions. We consider that this stark disparity calls for a fundamental shift in seaweed carbon research away from a focus on future sequestration gains and toward explicitly assessing the risk of carbon emissions from climate-driven ecosystem loss.

Indexed as

CarbonCarbon SequestrationClimate ChangeSeaweedEcosystemForestsCarbon

Identifiers

PMID42709921
PMCPMC13552959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.