Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709893›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Spatially guided translation from histology images to transcriptomic profiles using foundation model-driven contrastive learning.

Zi Huai Huang, Ziyang Xu, Pingzhao Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zi Huai HuangDepartment of Biochemistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Ziyang XuDepartment of Biochemistry, Western University, London, Canada.
Pingzhao HuDepartment of Biochemistry, Western University, London, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9546-2245

Funding

Breast Cancer CanadaCanada Research ChairsCIHRNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaThe Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial transcriptomics (ST) enhances single-cell RNA sequencing by revealing transcript distribution, offering critical insights into heterogeneous diseases such as breast cancer. However, the high cost and lengthy processes of generating high-quality ST data limit clinical application. Recent deep learning methods predict ST from histology images, but often fail to capture both morphological features and spatial context. We introduce FOCST, a foundation model-driven framework for ST imputation that leverages spatial guided contrastive learning. FOCST begins with UNI, a large histopathology foundation model, to extract visual features from tissue images. These are integrated with expression data in a unified embedding space via contrastive learning, enabling cross-modal prediction and imputation. To further enhance spatial awareness, a graph neural network incorporates positional information, improving regional detection and interpretability.Benchmarking demonstrates FOCST's superior performance over state-of-the-art methods and alternative vision encoders (paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, FDR-adjusted p < 0.05, N = 6 images). Predicted profiles enable clinically relevant downstream analyses, including patient stratification by treatment response (ROC AUC (Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under the Curve) = 0.79). Our results highlight the promise of combining foundation models and spatially guided learning to efficiently generate ST insights, advancing cancer research and precision medicine.

Indexed as

Graph Neural NetworksSpatial TranscriptomicsBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDeep LearningFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID42709893
PMCPMC13568522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.