ArticlePloS one2026
DSDAN: A Dual-Stream Multimodal Log-Flow Fusion Framework for Network Configuration Auditing and Compliance-Risk Detection.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing complexity of modern networks, particularly in IoT and distributed cloud environments, poses significant challenges for maintaining configuration integrity and compliance. Existing solutions for network auditing rely heavily on static rules or manual scripting, which fail to scale or adapt to dynamic network conditions. In this work, we propose a novel AI-driven framework, the Dual-Stream Deep Auditing Network (DSDAN), that leverages deep learning to automate configuration auditing and detect policy violations. DSDAN integrates structured network flow features and unstructured device logs through parallel encoder-decoder streams, enabling joint representation learning for robust compliance analysis. For evaluation, we combine IoT Device Network Logs and UNSW-NB15 because they represent two complementary evidence channels used in practical network auditing: device-level operational logs and flow-level behavioral security records. IoT logs support reconstruction-based identification of abnormal device or configuration behavior, while UNSW-NB15 provides labeled network-flow patterns for modeling unauthorized, anomalous, and attack-like activity. Using these complementary sources, DSDAN achieves an overall accuracy of 93.2%, macro F1-score of 0.918, and micro F1-score of 0.927, surpassing baseline models. The model further records an AUC of 0.957, PR-AUC of 0.948, and the lowest IoT log reconstruction error (MSE = 0.031, MAE = 0.020). Despite its dual-stream architecture, DSDAN maintains efficient inference with a latency of 3.1 ms and memory footprint of 110 MB. These results validate the effectiveness of our approach in identifying subtle misconfigurations and unauthorized behaviors often missed by traditional tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.