ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Evaluation of a Zika virus-like particle-based vaccine in a highly penetrant non-human primate model of congenital infection.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zika virus (ZIKV) is an arthropod-borne Orthoflavivirus that caused a major outbreak in Central and South America in 2015-16. During that outbreak, ZIKV infection during pregnancy was associated with high rates of adverse outcomes, including miscarriage and a spectrum of neurological birth defects collectively termed congenital Zika syndrome (CZS). Ten years later, there are still no licensed ZIKV vaccines, underscoring the need for robust experimental models to evaluate vaccine efficacy against congenital disease. Here, we evaluated a highly pathogenic nonhuman primate pregnancy model for its ability to assess vaccine-mediated protection using a Zika virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine as a test platform. First, non-pregnant rhesus macaques (RM) were vaccinated with a prime-boost method to compare control, VLP alone, and VLP plus Alhydrogel (alum) adjuvant. Vaccination plus alum elicited strong neutralizing antibody responses and reduced viral dissemination compared to controls. Next, we evaluated the vaccine's protective efficacy against adverse pregnancy complications. Two cohorts of female RM were vaccinated with ZIKV-VLP adjuvanted with alum or alum alone prior to time-mated breeding. At gestational day (GD) 30 (mid first trimester), pregnant animals were challenged with ZIKV-DAK 41524, an African-lineage strain previously shown to induce frequent first-trimester pregnancy loss. Within the vaccinated cohort, two of three animals reached the study endpoint of GD 90 with no observed adverse pregnancy outcomes. One vaccinated animal experienced early pregnancy loss despite the absence of detectable virus in fetal or placental tissues. In the sham vaccine control pregnancy cohort, severe adverse outcomes included miscarriage and hydrops fetalis with widespread viral RNA and placental pathology in two animals. These results support a high risk of early pregnancy loss following African-lineage ZIKV-DAK 41524 infection in RM. This model can be further used to understand the complexities of placental immunological features underlying miscarriage following ZIKV infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.