Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709796›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Increasing risk of vapor pressure deficit exceeding critical thresholds for tree growth.

Tiewei Li, Hans W Chen, Deliang Chen, Jingfeng Xiao, Lanlan Guo, Lianyou Liu, Feng Shi, Wenping Yuan, Ziqian Zhong, Huan Zheng and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tiewei LiDepartment of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Hans W ChenDepartment of Environmental and Energy Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE-412 96, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8601-6024
Deliang ChenDepartment of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Jingfeng XiaoEarth Systems Research Center, Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.ORCID 0000-0002-0622-6903
Lanlan GuoFaculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Lianyou LiuFaculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Feng ShiState Key Laboratory of Lithospheric and Environmental Coevolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
Wenping YuanInstitute of Carbon Neutrality, Sino-French Institute for Earth System Science, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Ziqian ZhongDepartment of Environmental and Energy Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg SE-412 96, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2608-0953
Huan ZhengFaculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Bin HeDepartment of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0009-0001-6918-0877

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation China 42361144877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With global warming, rising atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD) has emerged as a critical driver of vegetation productivity and the terrestrial carbon sink. Yet, the thresholds beyond which VPD constrains tree growth remain poorly quantified. Using 2,953 tree-ring sites and combining generalized additive models with threshold regression models, we demonstrate that growth-related VPD thresholds are widespread. Approximately 63% of the studied species groups exhibited identifiable thresholds, which were generally lower in cool, humid regions and higher in warm, dry environments. For the same tree species occurring under contrasting aridity conditions, thresholds also differed substantially. As VPD has risen, the proportion of sites exceeding these thresholds has increased rapidly since about 1970 and is projected to rise further under different emissions scenarios. Under SSP5-8.5 in particular, approximately 79.8% of the sites are projected to be exposed to VPD above their thresholds by the end of the century. Although potential upward threshold shifts associated with acclimation or adaptation could partly reduce future exceedance, this buffering effect becomes increasingly limited under stronger climate forcing. Without effective climate mitigation, rising VPD will increasingly exceed the tolerance thresholds of trees, placing more trees under sustained growth constraints and undermining terrestrial carbon sequestration.

Indexed as

TreesVapor PressureCarbon SequestrationClimate ChangeGlobal Warmingexceedanceexposethresholdtree growthvapor pressure deficit

Identifiers

PMID42709796
PMCPMC13578817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.