Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709775›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Recovery of a New England salt marsh six years after a natural sediment deposition event.

Gregg E Moore, Jennifer L Gibson, David M Burdick, Alondra Ortiz-Franco, Ashley N Bulseco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gregg E MooreDepartment of Biology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7424-0275
Jennifer L GibsonDepartment of Biology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0900-4302
David M BurdickDepartment of Natural Resources, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Alondra Ortiz-FrancoNatural Sciences Department, University of Puerto Rico-Cayey, Cayey, Puerto Rico, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1557-3709
Ashley N BulsecoDepartment of Biology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In January 2018, Winter Storm Grayson deposited a spatially heterogeneous layer of sediment across the Great Marsh on the North Shore of Massachusetts in Essex Bay, Ipswich Bay, and Plum Island. A published study of short-term responses following one growing season showed percent cover of vegetation was significantly lower in plots receiving sediment than controls, while porewater chemistry (salinity, redox potential, and sulfide concentrations) shifted slightly as biogeochemical processes developed in the new sediment. Six growing seasons post-deposition, these sites were re-evaluated to determine whether storm-delivered sediment (i) increases vegetation percent cover and species richness without suppressing plant height, (ii) influences porewater conditions, and (iii) promotes belowground live root density. Results show that vegetation cover and height were not significantly impacted by sediment thickness or year, and no interaction was found between year and sediment thickness. Salinity significantly decreased from 2018 to 2024, while interactive effects appeared for both redox potential and sulfides, largely driven by changes in plots that received 0-2 cm of sediment. Interactive effects of depth and sediment thickness on live root density appear driven by biomass in the control and 4-6 cm plots. Live root density in the top 4 cm was approximately equivalent for all core types with biomass increasing with depth until 10 cm for the plots receiving greater than 2 cm of sediment. Our results suggest that natural sediment inputs can supplement elevation and stimulate belowground biomass, particularly at thicknesses between 2-6 cm, without negatively impacting vegetation cover, species richness, or porewater chemistry at the landscape scale.

Indexed as

Geologic SedimentsWetlandsBiomassNew EnglandOxidation-ReductionPlant RootsSalinitySeasons

Identifiers

PMID42709775
PMCPMC13552792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.