Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709761›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Beyond semantics: Prosody can shape and modulate listeners' emotional experience of poetry - A cross-linguistic investigation.

Yan Li, Ziqing Huang, Yannan Zhang, Yufeng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yan LiCollege of Arts, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Ziqing HuangCollege of Arts, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3057-707X
Yannan ZhangCollege of Arts, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Yufeng ChenSchool of Literature, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expressive prosody plays an important role in conveying emotion during oral poetry performance. This study investigated whether emotional prosody can serve as a perceptually robust cue for emotion judgment when semantic comprehension is unavailable. Experiment 1 confirmed systematic acoustic differences between joyful and sad poem recitations: joyful recitations exhibited higher normalized pitch, greater vocal intensity, and faster articulation rate, whereas sad recitations exhibited lower normalized pitch, reduced intensity, slower articulation rate, and reduced harmonicity. Experiment 2 employed a 3 (prosody-semantics alignment: congruent, incongruent, neutral) × 2 (valence: joy vs. sadness) × 2 (listener group: native Mandarin vs. Mandarin-naive Japanese listeners) design. When prosody and semantics were aligned, both listener groups produced the strongest emotion ratings consistent with the poems' intended valence. Critically, Mandarin-naive Japanese listeners, who had no access to Chinese semantic content, showed strong modulation of affective judgments by available prosodic cues when vocal expression conflicted with the poems' textual valence. Native Mandarin listeners integrated semantic and expressive prosodic information, but prosodic manipulations substantially weakened semantic biases and, in some cases, shifted semantically driven judgments. These findings suggest that prosodic configuration is an important component of expressive vocal realization in poetic recitation, shaping listeners' affective responses alongside semantic content. Arousal-related acoustic variation may further contribute to these prosodic effects.

Indexed as

EmotionsLinguisticsPoetry as TopicSemanticsSpeech PerceptionAdultCuesFemaleHumansLanguageMaleSpeech AcousticsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42709761
PMCPMC13552738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.