ArticlePloS one2026
Beyond semantics: Prosody can shape and modulate listeners' emotional experience of poetry - A cross-linguistic investigation.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expressive prosody plays an important role in conveying emotion during oral poetry performance. This study investigated whether emotional prosody can serve as a perceptually robust cue for emotion judgment when semantic comprehension is unavailable. Experiment 1 confirmed systematic acoustic differences between joyful and sad poem recitations: joyful recitations exhibited higher normalized pitch, greater vocal intensity, and faster articulation rate, whereas sad recitations exhibited lower normalized pitch, reduced intensity, slower articulation rate, and reduced harmonicity. Experiment 2 employed a 3 (prosody-semantics alignment: congruent, incongruent, neutral) × 2 (valence: joy vs. sadness) × 2 (listener group: native Mandarin vs. Mandarin-naive Japanese listeners) design. When prosody and semantics were aligned, both listener groups produced the strongest emotion ratings consistent with the poems' intended valence. Critically, Mandarin-naive Japanese listeners, who had no access to Chinese semantic content, showed strong modulation of affective judgments by available prosodic cues when vocal expression conflicted with the poems' textual valence. Native Mandarin listeners integrated semantic and expressive prosodic information, but prosodic manipulations substantially weakened semantic biases and, in some cases, shifted semantically driven judgments. These findings suggest that prosodic configuration is an important component of expressive vocal realization in poetic recitation, shaping listeners' affective responses alongside semantic content. Arousal-related acoustic variation may further contribute to these prosodic effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.