ArticlePloS one2026
Forecasting alcohol lapse risk up to two weeks in advance using time-lagged machine learning models.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alcohol use disorder is a chronic, relapsing condition. Individuals must monitor risk and take proactive steps to manage and reduce it indefinitely to prevent lapse. Smartphone sensing and machine learning offer promise as scalable tools for automating risk monitoring and delivering personalized support during recovery. Research has demonstrated that machine learning models using ecological momentary assessment can generate highly accurate predictions of immediate lapse risk (e.g., within the next hour or day). However, many risks require supports that are not immediately available. These supports may need to be planned or involve coordination with others. In such cases, individuals may benefit from advance warning about changes in their lapse risk and the contributing factors. To meet this need, we developed machine learning models to predict future alcohol lapses within 24-hour prediction windows, lagged by 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, and 2 weeks from the prediction timepoint. We engineered features from 4x daily ecological momentary assessments from individuals (N = 151; 51% male; mean age = 41; 87% non-Hispanic White) in early recovery (≤ 8 weeks of abstinence) from alcohol use disorder over a three-month period. We trained and evaluated models using nested cross-validation. Median posterior auROC values were high (0.85-0.89) across models, though performance decreased modestly with longer lag time. Models performed worse for non-advantaged groups (non-White and/or Hispanic, income below federal poverty line, female) compared to advantaged groups (non-Hispanic White, income above federal poverty line, male). Past alcohol use, abstinence self-efficacy, and craving were the most important features, with the magnitude of their importance varying meaningfully by lag time. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of predicting alcohol lapses up to two weeks in advance. Embedding these models within a recovery monitoring and support system could enable adaptive, personalized care with enough warning to implement recovery supports not immediately available. Improving model fairness and optimizing the delivery of model feedback to sustain engagement remain critical next steps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.