ArticlePloS one2026
Autism and ADHD social media short-form video content: A systematic review protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleSocial media platforms have made information about mental health more accessible than ever, with over 60% of young adults using social media as a primary information source. Content about neurodiversity issues, including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), is highly popular online. Researchers and mental health professionals have expressed concerns over the lack of vetting and potential spread of misinformation on social media. To date, there has been no synthesis of the literature examining the scientific accuracy of short-form video content about ADHD and ASD, and the downstream impacts of this content.
objectives1) Describe the popularity and characteristics of ADHD and ASD short-form video content, 2) Evaluate the extent to which it follows clinical guidelines, 3) Explore its impacts on stigma, treatment- and diagnosis-seeking, and symptom perceptions.
methodsThis protocol is designed in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. PsycINFO, PubMed, and SCOPUS will be used for the literature search. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods peer-reviewed research published in English by June 1, 2026, will be considered. Once duplicate studies are removed, pairs of independent reviewers will determine eligibility first through the review of titles and abstracts and then full text review. Descriptive and thematic analysis methods will be used to analyze extracted data.
conclusionFindings from this work can provide a better understanding of the social media content about ADHD and ASD and the ways it may impact viewers. PRE-REGISTRATION: A protocol of this systematic literature review will be registered with Open Science Framework Registries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.