ArticlePloS one2026
A comparative analysis of syntactic complexity in English academic texts by Chinese MTI trainee translators and native academic writers.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper aims to investigate the differences in syntactic complexity between academic English translation by Chinese MTI trainee translators (TTAE) and academic English by native writers (NAE). The study is based on two self-built corpora and employs the L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer (L2SCA) to analyze syntactic complexity. The results show that the two groups of texts differ significantly in nine out of fourteen measures of syntactic complexity. The syntactic complexity of NAE is higher in the T-unit complexity ratio, Complex T-unit ratio, Dependent clause ratio, and Dependent clause per T-unit, while the syntactic complexity of TTAE is higher in Complex nominals per T-unit, Complex nominals per clause, Coordinate phrases per T-unit, Coordinate phrases per clause, and Mean length of clause. Compared with native writers who tend to use shorter clauses, more subordinate structures, and more complex T-units, Chinese MTI trainee translators produce longer clauses, coordinated structures, complex noun phrases, and relatively reduced syntactic dispersion. Those findings suggest a syntactic profile that favors phrasal elaboration over clausal elaboration, accompanied by relatively reduced syntactic complexity. The reasons for the differences are briefly discussed, revealing the influence of L2 language development, source -text effect, and translation strategies. This research provides insights for translation teaching and contributes to a better understanding of the syntactic characteristics of trainee translators' academic English.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.