Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709475›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2026

No Response to Inconsistently Experienced Inequity in Four Primate Species.

Sierra M V Simmons, Lydia M Hopper, Annika Paukner, Hani D Freeman, Catherine F Talbot, Susan P Lambeth, Steven J Schapiro, Lawrence E Williams, Sarah F Brosnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sierra M V SimmonsDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1747-1821
Lydia M HopperLanguage Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5953-3264
Annika PauknerSchool of Social Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3421-1864
Hani D FreemanLanguage Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Catherine F TalbotLanguage Research Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4604-6891
Susan P LambethMichale E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Steven J SchapiroMichale E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Lawrence E WilliamsMichale E. Keeling Center for Comparative Medicine and Research, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sarah F BrosnanDepartment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5117-6706

Funding

VIBROSTIMULATION IS SUPERIOR TO ELECTRO EJACULATION IN MONKEYS: COLLECT SPERMP40RR001254 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ABEE, CHRISTIAN R · 1985 to 2011
$8.8M
Division of Intramural Research, NICHDNCRR NIH HHS P40 RR001254NIH HHS P40-RR001254NIH HHS SES 0847351NIH HHS U42 RR-15090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding when and how nonhuman primates respond to inequity is essential for uncovering the evolutionary roots of human fairness. Previous studies have shown that some species will refuse to participate or refuse rewards in some contexts when outcomes are unequal, but in these studies, subjects experienced inequity on every trial. This is likely not a realistic reflection of daily life, and we do not know whether these responses persist when inequity is experienced inconsistently. We tested four primates'-chimpanzees, capuchins, squirrel monkeys, and owl monkeys-responses in conditions in which inequity occurred in either 25% or 50% of trials. None exhibited increased refusal rates in response to inequity or contrast relative to controls, despite the fact that in prior studies with inequity on every trial, these capuchin monkeys and chimpanzees responded to inequity and these squirrel monkeys showed contrast effects. Their lack of response suggests that while primates will refuse to participate due to inequity in some cases, such inequity must be experienced relatively frequently or consistently to trigger refusals to participate. Future work should explore the thresholds at which inequity prompts these refusals and develop other paradigms to test if they notice and/or respond in other ways to inequity, particularly at lower thresholds.

Indexed as

AotidaeCebusPan troglodytesSaimiriSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMaleAotusCebuscomparativeinequity aversionPan troglodytesSaimirivariable rewards

Identifiers

PMID42709475
PMCPMC13552573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.