ArticleJAMA network open2026
Blinatumomab Care Delivery for Pediatric B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Blinatumomab, a novel immunotherapy administered as a 28-day continuous infusion, has fundamentally shifted the treatment paradigm for pediatric B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and is now considered a component of standard therapy for the most common childhood cancer. However, the care delivery challenges in transitioning from an experimental agent on a clinical trial to widespread clinical implementation are unknown. Objective: To characterize the clinical landscape of pediatric blinatumomab care-delivery practice and challenges in the US from the perspective of treating centers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was conducted from February to March 2025 among US member institutions of the Children's Oncology Group (COG) across 44 states. Exposure: Institutional characteristics, including participation in the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), US census region, site-reported annual pediatric ALL patient volume, and prior blinatumomab experience, were assessed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incorporation of blinatumomab as standard therapy by pediatric B-ALL subtype; major outpatient care-delivery challenges defined as 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale by more than 25% of centers. Results: Of 195 active US COG member institutions, 147 centers completed the survey and were successfully matched with a unique COG identifier, among which 35 institutions (23.8%) were NCORP participants. There were 32 institutions (21.8%) in Midwest, 30 institutions (20.4%) in Northeast, 60 institutions (40.8%) in South, and 25 institutions (17.0%) in West census regions. Most centers reported using blinatumomab as their institutional standard therapy for National Cancer Institute standard risk-average (134 centers [91.2%]), standard risk-high (144 centers [98.0%]), and high-risk (140 centers [95.2%]) B-ALL. Fewer centers reported using blinatumomab for infant (83 centers [56.5%]) or Philadelphia chromosome-positive (96 centers [65.3%]) B-ALL. The most common major outpatient blinatumomab site care-delivery challenges included lack of home care companies (75 centers [51.0%]), family distance to treating center (41 centers [27.9%]), and insurance coverage for home care companies (37 centers [25.2%]). There were 67 sites (45.6%) that reported having no home care company options for any patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, challenges associated with pediatric blinatumomab home care were highly prevalent, with broader implications for health system infrastructure availability. These data highlight a need to plan for clinical implementation strategies alongside the development and testing of novel therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.