ArticleTree physiology2026
Conservative versus flexible physiological and metabolic acclimation of Norway spruce and European beech under elevated CO2, nitrogen supply and water availability.
Article in Tree physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) (EC) can enhance photosynthesis, biomass accumulation and water-use efficiency (WUE), but responses depend on water and nutrient availability and differ among tree species. Multifactorial studies addressing these interactions remain scarce. We examined interactive effects of EC (~700 μmol mol-1), nitrogen supply (nitrogen addition, N+; no nitrogen addition, N-) and water availability (well-watered, WW; drought-stressed, DS) on physiological and metabolic responses of more anisohydric European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), which maintains stomatal opening longer during drought, and more isohydric Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), which closes stomata earlier to stabilize leaf water status. Across both species, EC produced the largest shifts in gas exchange and metabolite profiles, while water and nitrogen availability strongly modified these responses. Elevated CO2 generally increased net CO2 assimilation and WUE and reduced stomatal conductance, although responses differed between species and treatments; WUE was highest under EC × DS × N+. Species divergence was most evident in biochemical acclimation. In beech, EC markedly reduced photosynthetic capacity, reflected in lower Rubisco carboxylation capacity (VCmax) and electron transport rate (Jmax) across water and nitrogen treatments. This response was accompanied by lower succinate and foliar nitrogen and by resource-dependent shifts in amino acids, phenolic and stress-related metabolites, consistent with greater metabolic reorganization and photosynthetic downregulation. In contrast, spruce maintained comparatively stable VCmax and Jmax under EC, including under DS and N- conditions, together with comparatively stable primary metabolism and sustained phenolic-based defence. Overall, beech showed greater physiological and metabolic flexibility but stronger downregulation of photosynthetic capacity under EC, whereas spruce maintained a more conservative physiological strategy and greater biochemical stability. These contrasting responses highlight species-specific acclimation to CO2 enrichment and its modulation by water and nitrogen availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.