Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709401›Full record

ReviewPulmonary therapy2026

Cough in Interstitial Lung Disease: Current Knowledge and Research Gaps.

Giacomo Giulianelli, Serena Bellani, Gioele Castelli, Giordano Fiorentù, Elisabetta Balestro, Surinder S Birring, Paolo Spagnolo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pulmonary therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giacomo Giulianelli *Respiratory Disease Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128, Padova, Italy. giacomo.giulianelli@aopd.veneto.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1895-689X
Serena Bellani *Respiratory Disease Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Gioele CastelliRespiratory Disease Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Giordano FiorentùRespiratory Disease Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Elisabetta BalestroRespiratory Disease Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Surinder S BirringCentre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, School of Basic and Medical Biosciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Paolo SpagnoloRespiratory Disease Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic cough is one of the most frequent and burdensome symptoms in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), substantially impairing quality of life and, in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), being associated with disease progression. Despite its clinical relevance, the mechanisms underlying cough in ILD remain incompletely understood, and effective therapeutic options are limited. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical assessment, and management of cough across the spectrum of ILD. Current data support the concept that ILD-related cough results from a complex interplay between cough reflex hypersensitivity, mechanical distortion of the fibrotic lung, airway and parenchymal inflammation, neural remodeling, and common comorbidities such as gastroesophageal reflux disease and obstructive sleep apnea. Disease-specific mechanisms are also discussed in connective tissue disease-associated ILD, sarcoidosis, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. We review currently available qualitative and quantitative methods for cough assessment, including patient-reported outcome measures and objective cough monitoring technologies, highlighting their strengths and limitations in clinical practice and research. Finally, we examine established and emerging therapeutic approaches. While antifibrotic therapies have shown limited and inconsistent effects on cough, recent randomized clinical trials provide encouraging evidence for low-dose morphine and extended-release nalbuphine in IPF-associated chronic cough. Nonpharmacological interventions, particularly physiotherapy and speech and language therapy, also demonstrate meaningful benefits. Several novel therapeutic strategies targeting neural and inflammatory pathways are currently under investigation. A better understanding of the mechanisms driving cough in ILD, together with standardized assessment tools and adequately powered clinical trials, will be essential to develop effective, disease-specific treatments for this disabling symptom.

Indexed as

Antitussive therapyChronic coughCoughCough hypersensitivityIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisInterstitial lung diseaseObjective cough monitoringOpioidsPatient-reported outcomesProgressive pulmonary fibrosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.