Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709367›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026

Predicting patient care pathway deviations and their consequences in anaesthesia using machine learning.

Rémi Florquin, Philippe Dony

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rémi FlorquinDepartment of Anaesthesiology, CHU Charleroi, Lodelinsart, 6042, Belgium. Remi.florquin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6091-1146
Philippe DonyDepartment of Anaesthesiology, CHU Charleroi, Lodelinsart, 6042, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-4140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deviation from the intended perioperative care pathway, particularly unplanned admission after day-case surgery, affects patient safety and the efficient organisation of care. We aimed to develop and compare interpretable machine-learning models predicting such deviations from information available before surgery. In this retrospective study, 51,112 consecutive ambulatory anaesthesia procedures from a Belgian network were analysed, with unplanned admission as the outcome. Data were partitioned into training, validation, and test sets; class imbalance was addressed with SMOTENC on the training data alone. Seven algorithms: logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, histogram-based gradient boosting, and explainable boosting machine (EBM) were compared using discrimination, precision-recall, and calibration metrics at two operating points (fixed sensitivity and fixed specificity). Unplanned admission occurred in 9.08% of patients. Discrimination varied markedly, the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve achieved by the explainable boosting machine (EBM, 0.826), the lowest by logistic regression (0.595). Given the rarity of the outcome, precision-recall was most informative: the EBM attained both the highest average precision (0.472) and F1-score (0.392), exceeding the black-box ensembles while remaining intrinsically interpretable. Performance was stable between validation and test sets, arguing against overfitting, although all models over-estimated risk and need recalibration. Machine learning applied to routinely collected data can identify patients at risk of deviating from their intended day-case pathway with stable performance and the potential for clinical usefulness. The explainable boosting machine is especially attractive, combining competitive accuracy with transparency. Prospective validation and recalibration of the predicted probabilities will be required before clinical deployment.

Indexed as

AnaesthesiaArtificial intelligenceBig dataMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.