Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709362›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2026

A deep learning framework for automated quantification of peripheral nerve lesions in MR neurography.

Nedim C Beste, Clara Raudonat, Melissa Fesselier, Sebastian Hartmann, Daniel Sommer, Johann M E Jende, Jonathan Kottlors, Sabine Heiland, Hagen Meredig, Martin Bendszus and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nedim C BesteInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Clara RaudonatDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Melissa FesselierDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian HartmannDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel SommerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Johann M E JendeGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Jonathan KottlorsInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sabine HeilandDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hagen MeredigDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin BendszusDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph M MooshageDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. christoph.mooshage@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3436-9298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMagnetic resonance neurography (MRN) enables high-resolution visualization of peripheral nerves, yet quantitative analysis of intraneural lesion burden remains limited by manual, observer-dependent workflows. We propose a deep learning-based framework for automated segmentation and quantitative characterization of peripheral nerve lesions in MRN. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study (n = 178), standardized axial fat-suppressed T2-weighted 3-T MRN scans of the distal thigh were analyzed. Sciatic nerves and intraneural lesions were manually annotated to train a modified nnU-Net v2 architecture for 2D and 3D segmentation. Model performance was evaluated using Dice and surface Dice metrics. Generalizability was assessed across two independent test datasets. Imaging-derived lesion burden metrics were further related to electrophysiological parameters using age-adjusted partial correlation analyses.

resultsAutomated nerve segmentation achieved a median Dice coefficient of 0.97. Lesion segmentation yielded surface Dice values of 0.64-0.77 across training and independent test sets, demonstrating stable generalization in a small-structure segmentation setting. Quantitative lesion burden metrics were consistent across cohorts and showed significant associations with electrophysiological measures of nerve function. For example, automated total lesion load correlated significantly with tibial nerve conduction velocity (r = -0.62, p < 0.001) and tibial compound motor action potential (r = -0.568, p 0.002) in age-adjusted partial correlation analyses.

conclusionThis work introduces a reproducible deep learning-based framework for automated segmentation and quantitative assessment of peripheral nerve lesions in MR neurography. The approach enables standardized volumetric characterization of small intraneural abnormalities and provides a basis for scalable, quantitative peripheral nerve imaging. KEY POINTS: Question: AI automatically detects and measures nerve damage in MRI scans.

findingsMethod provides a fast, consistent alternative to manual image analysis. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Automated MRI-based nerve lesion quantification enables objective, reproducible assessment of peripheral neuropathies, potentially improving diagnostic accuracy, monitoring disease progression, and supporting standardized, scalable evaluation in both clinical practice and research.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingPeripheral NervesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesAdultAgedAutomationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceMagnetic resonance imagingNeural networks (Computer)Periphereal nervous system dieseasesSciatic neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID42709362
PMCPMC13553995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.