ReviewHuman cell2026
Modeling meningioma in vitro in the omics era.
Review in Human cell, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningioma biology has been substantially clarified by recent omics-based studies, which have identified recurrent mutations, copy-number alterations, and distinct molecular subgroups. However, although these approaches have provided a valuable framework, they are inherently limited in their ability to establish direct causal relationships. The mechanistic studies are therefore indispensable for translating these molecular observations into biological understanding. Nevertheless, the mechanistic literature has often evolved in a fragmented manner, with individual pathways and model systems studied in relative isolation from the broader multi-omic landscape. In this review, we synthesize these complementary bodies of work into an integrated framework and outline a clear roadmap for future studies. We first review the historical development of established meningioma cell lines, their current molecular characterization, and the recent emergence of 3D models and organoids. Intrinsic challenges in modeling meningioma in vitro are discussed, including the difficulty of establishing immortalized cell lines from predominantly benign tumors, genetic alterations introduced during immortalization, and drift under culture conditions that differ substantially from those of the parental tumors. Next, insights from functional studies centered on these models are integrated within the molecular framework established by large-scale omics analyses. To avoid fragmentation and overemphasis on isolated findings, prior studies are organized into six categories based on major signaling pathways: Hippo, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, MAPK, Wnt/β-catenin, FOXM1, and Notch. Finally, lessons from other cancer models, including experimental approaches to chromosome-scale genomic disturbances, are considered to provide a more integrated view of meningioma biology and to highlight directions for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.