ArticleJournal of gambling studies2026
Moving Up in Stakes in Tournament Poker: A k-means Analysis of Latent Subgroups of Online Poker Players.
Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In tournament poker, skilled and profitable players can increase their stakes (e.g., enter tournaments with higher entry fees) in mathematically logical attempts to win more money faster. There are open questions about what types of players move up in stakes, and if those who move up in stakes are more likely to experience gambling-related problems. The current study addresses this issue by examining the actual tournament player records of a large European online gambling operator. For 1,603 players, we documented instances of moving up in stakes over a 66-month study period (February 2015 to July 2020). A k-means cluster analysis suggested four groups of players. Three groups were roughly defined by increasing levels of poker tournament involvement and ROI: Group A, least involved, worst ROI, n = 775; Group B, in the middle, n = 724; Group C, most involved, best (though still negative) ROI, n = 102. The last group, Group D, contained outliers (n = 2). Members of more involved groups were more likely than members of less involved groups to move up in stakes at least once. Members of Groups A and C were less likely to have a responsible gambling (RG) related account closure (either a temporary "cool-off" period preventing gambling on the website or a self- or operator-initiated account closure) than members of Group B. Moving up had no observable association with having an RG-related account closure within groups. Among less and moderately involved players, moving up in stakes is likely associated with increased poker tournament participation, but not with RG-related account closures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42709307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.