Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709285›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2026

Clinical and epidemiological features of cat-scratch disease: a 16-year case retrospective study in a portuguese tertiary care centre.

Adriana Pimenta, Rita de Sousa, Margarida Tavares, Sandra Rebelo, Rafael Rocha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adriana PimentaFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Rita de SousaCentro de Estudos de Vetores e Doenças Infeciosas, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Dr. Ricardo Jorge (CEVDI-INSA), Águas de Moura, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6134-6003
Margarida TavaresServiço de Pediatria, Hospital de São João, Unidade Local de Saúde de São João, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9544-0484
Sandra RebeloFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5358-5204
Rafael RochaFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal. rafael.rocha@ulssjoao.min-saude.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7451-9137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCat-scratch disease (CSD), primarily caused by Bartonella henselae, is a well-recognized zoonosis with a broad clinical spectrum, in which atypical manifestations may delay diagnosis. This study aimed to characterize the clinical and epidemiological profile of CSD at a Portuguese tertiary care centre and to evaluate the role of molecular and serological methods as complementary tools.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients with laboratory-confirmed CSD diagnosed at Unidade Local de Saúde de São João, Porto, between 2010 and 2025. PCR-positive specimens were further characterized by sequencing for Bartonella species identification. Comparative analyses were performed according to clinical presentation (typical versus systemic disease).

resultsThirty-nine patients were included (median age 15 years), of whom 53.8% were paediatric. Cat exposure was reported in 94.9% of cases. Information regarding flea infestation and preventive measures in companion animals was unavailable. Systemic presentations occurred in 43.6% (17/39) of patients, most of whom (94.1%, 16/17) were immunocompetent. Among PCR-positive specimens successfully characterized by sequencing, all were identified as B. henselae. PCR positivity was higher in lymph node tissue than in blood specimens (79.2% vs. 15.8%). The median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 52.5 days. At the time of diagnosis, serology was positive for IgG antibodies in 76.0% and IgM in 28.0% of CSD patients. Azithromycin monotherapy was most frequently used for typical disease (81.8%), whereas combination therapy was more commonly used in systemic cases (76.5%). Clinical resolution after a single treatment course was achieved in 74.4% of patients.

conclusionCSD frequently presented with systemic involvement, including in immunocompetent patients. The prolonged delay between symptom onset and diagnosis highlights the need for increased clinical awareness, and improved access to serological and molecular diagnostics. Given the high frequency of cat exposure among affected patients, One Health strategies focused on responsible pet ownership, regular flea control and veterinary follow-up, may contribute to reducing Bartonella transmission and the burden of CSD.

Indexed as

Bartonella henselaeCat-scratch diseaseLymphadenopathyPortugalZoonosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.