Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709269›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2026

When orcas hit the rudder: what Iberian orca-boat interactions reveal about action explanations in animal cognition.

Christian Frings

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christian FringsCognitive Psychology, University of Trier, Universitätsring 15, 54296, Trier, Germany. chfrings@uni-trier.de.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FOR2790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2020, Iberian orcas have repeatedly interacted with sailing vessels, often targeting rudders. These well-documented interactions have been discussed primarily as play, exploration, maladaptation, or a product of cultural transmission. Here, I argue for a complementary interpretation. This phenomenon also exposes a broader explanatory issue in animal cognition: complex animal behavior in the wild is often described without an explicit theory of action. Drawing on cognitive action-effect approaches, I suggest that rudder-directed interactions may also be understood as actions organized around anticipated environmental consequences. The orca case thus highlights the need for action models that can travel across species, ecological contexts, and disciplinary boundaries.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCognitionAnimals

Identifiers

PMID42709269
PMCPMC13553601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.