ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
Protease inhibition: breaking the barriers of chemoresistance in cancer.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemoresistance remains a major barrier to effective cancer therapy, limiting durable responses across multiple malignancies. Proteases, including matrix metalloproteinases, cathepsins, ubiquitin-specific proteases, proteasome components, and mitochondrial proteases, contribute to chemoresistance through diverse mechanisms, including modulation of drug transport, extracellular matrix remodeling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, apoptosis, and pro-survival signaling. Collectively, these processes promote a tumor microenvironment that facilitates therapeutic escape. This review critically synthesizes current mechanistic evidence together with available clinical studies on protease-mediated chemoresistance, emphasizing the gap between strong biological rationale and limited clinical success. Broad-spectrum protease inhibition has shown limited clinical success owing to insufficient isoform selectivity, compensatory signaling, inadequate biomarker-guided patient stratification, and limited pharmacodynamic validation. Emerging strategies focus on context-specific protease targeting, biomarker guided patient selection, rational combination therapy, and advanced drug delivery platforms, including protease-activated prodrugs and nanoparticle-based systems. Integration of proteomic profiling with functional validation may facilitate identification of protease dependencies and support more precise therapeutic interventions. Collectively, these advances suggest that protease inhibition may evolve from empirical enzyme blockade toward mechanism-driven approaches for overcoming chemoresistance, although further clinical validation remains necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42709258What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.