Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709243›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026

Cauda equina syndrome: a structured approach for the higher orthopaedic examination.

Srinath Pammi, Praveen Rajan, Himaja Narapareddy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Srinath PammiBasildon University Hospital, Basildon, UK. srinath.pammi@nhs.net.
Praveen RajanBasildon University Hospital, Basildon, UK.
Himaja NarapareddyBasildon University Hospital, Basildon, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide a focused, examination-oriented review of cauda equina syndrome (CES), covering definition and classification, clinical assessment, bladder dysfunction, emergency imaging and referral, surgical timing, and postoperative rehabilitation.

methodsMEDLINE/PubMed and relevant national guidance were reviewed and updated to 22 August 2026. Priority was given to UK guidance, systematic reviews and multicentre studies, including the current Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) national suspected CES pathway, updated in March 2026.

resultsCES is a clinical syndrome of sacral nerve-root dysfunction and should not be defined by an MRI appearance or by painless retention alone. The current UK pathway recommends emergency MRI at the presenting hospital as soon as possible and within four hours of the radiology request, without prior spinal-team approval. Post-void residual (PVR) measurement is an adjunct: a value of at least 200 mL increases suspicion, but a lower value does not exclude CES. Routine digital rectal examination solely to assess resting anal tone is not required. Imaging-confirmed compression requires immediate spinal referral. Incomplete CES should be decompressed as quickly as possible; CES with retention should be treated within 24h of MRI under the current pathway.

conclusionFor both the examination and clinical practice, the priorities are early recognition of sacral symptoms, rapid MRI, avoidance of false reassurance from a single bedside test, urgent senior-led decompression when compression is confirmed, and structured bladder, bowel, sexual and psychological rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Cauda Equina SyndromeDecompression, SurgicalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingUrinary RetentionCauda equina syndromeDecompressionMagnetic resonance imagingPost-void residualSurgical timingUrinary retention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.