ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Gastric carcinoma classification in the WHO 6th edition (2026): Updated framework and emerging entities.
Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sixth edition of the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumours (2026) represents an important step in the continuing evolution of gastric carcinoma classification. While preserving morphology as the foundation of diagnosis, it incorporates advances in molecular pathology, genotype-phenotype correlations, tumour evolution, and predictive biomarker assessment. This review summarizes the development of the WHO classification from the third edition (2000) to the sixth edition (2026) and highlights its relationship with other major classification systems, including those of Laurén, Nakamura, and the Japanese Gastric Carcinoma Association (JGCA). Major histological categories remain largely unchanged; however, several important conceptual and diagnostic refinements have been introduced. These include recognition of crawling-type adenocarcinoma as a distinctive variant of tubular adenocarcinoma, subclassification of poorly cohesive carcinoma into signet-ring cell and non-signet-ring cell subtypes, introduction of the concept of pure signet-ring cell carcinoma, and increased emphasis on tumour evolution. The sixth edition also expands and refines the spectrum of uncommon gastric carcinoma subtypes, including gastric carcinoma with lymphoid stroma, AFP-producing carcinoma, micropapillary adenocarcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic-gland type, and gastric sarcomatoid carcinoma. Crucially, molecular subgroups originally proposed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and actionable biomarkers-including HER2 (ERBB2), Claudin 18.2, mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-have transitioned from research-based categories into essential tools for precision oncology. Rather than providing exhaustive diagnostic criteria, this review offers a conceptual framework and encourages consultation of the original WHO text for full details. These advances illustrate the transition of gastric carcinoma classification from a predominantly morphology-based system toward an integrated histomolecular framework that more closely links pathological diagnosis with tumour biology, prognostication, and therapeutic stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42709193What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.