Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709165›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026

Efficacy and safety of memantine in adults with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lara Hamzeh Hamzeh, Enas Seyed, Mena Ayman Elgendy, Daher Heib, Beshoy I Sadek, Chalak O S Mohammed, Karima El Refaei, Yara F Soliman, Nora Eldmrdash, Mahmoud Shaaban Abdelgalil and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lara Hamzeh HamzehFaculty of Medicine, Caucasus International University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Enas Seyed *Faculty of Medicine, Al-Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Mena Ayman Elgendy *Faculty of Medicine, Misr University for Science and Technology, Giza, Egypt.
Daher Heib *Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Beshoy I SadekFaculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Chalak O S MohammedFaculty of Medicine, Kirkuk University, Kirkuk, Iraq.
Karima El RefaeiSchool of Medicine, Newgiza University, Giza, Egypt.
Yara F SolimanFaculty of Medicine, Mansoura National University, Dakahlia, Egypt.
Nora EldmrdashFaculty of Medicine, Delta University for Science and Technology, Dakahlia, Egypt.
Mahmoud Shaaban AbdelgalilFaculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mahmoud M ElsayedDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. elsayema@musc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited disease-modifying treatment options. Memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, has been investigated in ALS, but its safety remains unclear. This study systematically assessed the safety of memantine in adults with ALS. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials of memantine in adults with ALS. Outcomes included ALSFRS-R and FVC decline, adverse neurological events, total and serious adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and all-cause mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Because of heterogeneous reporting and missing variance estimates, ALSFRS-R and FVC outcomes were synthesized narratively; only safety outcomes were pooled quantitatively. Three randomized controlled trials (706 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Functional and respiratory outcomes could not be pooled because of heterogeneous reporting, and no consistent benefit was observed. Memantine showed lower headache incidence than placebo (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.19-0.96), with no significant differences in constipation, falls, dizziness, treatment discontinuation, or all-cause mortality. Memantine showed a borderline increase in serious adverse events (RR 1.52; 95% CI 1.00-2.31) and a higher risk of total adverse events (RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.30). Memantine was associated with a small but significant increase in total adverse events and a trend toward more serious adverse events, without improving functional decline, respiratory function, or survival in ALS. Current evidence does not support its use as a disease-modifying or adjunctive therapy. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD420261277874.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisMemantineMeta-analysisMotor neuron diseaseNMDA receptor antagonistRandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID42709165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.