ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
Efficacy and safety of memantine in adults with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with limited disease-modifying treatment options. Memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, has been investigated in ALS, but its safety remains unclear. This study systematically assessed the safety of memantine in adults with ALS. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials of memantine in adults with ALS. Outcomes included ALSFRS-R and FVC decline, adverse neurological events, total and serious adverse events, treatment discontinuation, and all-cause mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Because of heterogeneous reporting and missing variance estimates, ALSFRS-R and FVC outcomes were synthesized narratively; only safety outcomes were pooled quantitatively. Three randomized controlled trials (706 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Functional and respiratory outcomes could not be pooled because of heterogeneous reporting, and no consistent benefit was observed. Memantine showed lower headache incidence than placebo (RR 0.43; 95% CI 0.19-0.96), with no significant differences in constipation, falls, dizziness, treatment discontinuation, or all-cause mortality. Memantine showed a borderline increase in serious adverse events (RR 1.52; 95% CI 1.00-2.31) and a higher risk of total adverse events (RR 1.19; 95% CI 1.09-1.30). Memantine was associated with a small but significant increase in total adverse events and a trend toward more serious adverse events, without improving functional decline, respiratory function, or survival in ALS. Current evidence does not support its use as a disease-modifying or adjunctive therapy. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD420261277874.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42709165What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.