ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
Mapping the peripheral sensory dimension of dystonia: a five-axis analysis.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dystonia is conventionally attributed to dysfunction in central motor circuits, yet several clinical features, including sensory tricks, task specificity, and abnormalities in somatosensory processing, indicate an influence of sensory input. Whether peripheral sensory afferents are passive conduits to central circuits or contribute to dystonia pathophysiology remains unresolved. To examine whether peripheral sensory afferents participate in dystonia networks beyond their role as upstream inputs. Evidence was synthesized across five domains: phenomenology, electrophysiology, neuroimaging, genetics, and treatment. Priority was given to studies that manipulated or quantified peripheral afferent input and assessed effects on motor output or network physiology. Sensory tricks produce rapid improvement across dystonia phenotypes, indicating that afferent input can influence motor output. Electrophysiological studies demonstrate impaired afferent modulation of intracortical inhibition, abnormal integration of converging sensory inputs, and reduced reflex suppression at spinal and brainstem levels. Neuroimaging studies show somatosensory representations and changes in network activity. Genetic and animal studies implicate dystonia-associated pathways in the regulation of proprioceptive afferent signaling, and sensory-neuron-specific manipulations can induce or reduce abnormal movements. Therapeutic interventions, including peripheral stimulation, botulinum toxin, and sensory blockade, have been associated with reductions in dystonic symptoms through mechanisms that alter afferent input. Findings from phenomenological, electrophysiological, neuroimaging, genetic, and therapeutic studies indicate that peripheral sensory afferents contribute to dystonia networks. These observations are consistent with a model in which abnormalities of afferent gating, sensory integration, and somatosensory representation contribute to dystonic expression across multiple levels of the neuraxis, with potential implications for therapeutic targeting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42709164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.