Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709164›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026

Mapping the peripheral sensory dimension of dystonia: a five-axis analysis.

Anish Mehta, Thyagarajan Shivashanmugam, Michiko K Bruno, Shermyn Neo, Louis C S Tan, Roongroj Bhidayasiri, Sanjay Pandey, Kailash P Bhatia, Pramod Kumar Pal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anish MehtaDepartment of Neurology, Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals, Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, New BEL Road, MSR Nagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560054, India. anishmehta1302@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0200-1835
Thyagarajan ShivashanmugamDepartment of Research, Placeboes Research Foundation, Bengaluru, India.
Michiko K BrunoParkinson's and Movement Disorder Center, The Queen's Medical Center, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Shermyn NeoDepartment of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Louis C S TanDepartment of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Roongroj BhidayasiriDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sanjay PandeyDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Medicine, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Faridabad, India.
Kailash P BhatiaDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Pramod Kumar PalDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dystonia is conventionally attributed to dysfunction in central motor circuits, yet several clinical features, including sensory tricks, task specificity, and abnormalities in somatosensory processing, indicate an influence of sensory input. Whether peripheral sensory afferents are passive conduits to central circuits or contribute to dystonia pathophysiology remains unresolved. To examine whether peripheral sensory afferents participate in dystonia networks beyond their role as upstream inputs. Evidence was synthesized across five domains: phenomenology, electrophysiology, neuroimaging, genetics, and treatment. Priority was given to studies that manipulated or quantified peripheral afferent input and assessed effects on motor output or network physiology. Sensory tricks produce rapid improvement across dystonia phenotypes, indicating that afferent input can influence motor output. Electrophysiological studies demonstrate impaired afferent modulation of intracortical inhibition, abnormal integration of converging sensory inputs, and reduced reflex suppression at spinal and brainstem levels. Neuroimaging studies show somatosensory representations and changes in network activity. Genetic and animal studies implicate dystonia-associated pathways in the regulation of proprioceptive afferent signaling, and sensory-neuron-specific manipulations can induce or reduce abnormal movements. Therapeutic interventions, including peripheral stimulation, botulinum toxin, and sensory blockade, have been associated with reductions in dystonic symptoms through mechanisms that alter afferent input. Findings from phenomenological, electrophysiological, neuroimaging, genetic, and therapeutic studies indicate that peripheral sensory afferents contribute to dystonia networks. These observations are consistent with a model in which abnormalities of afferent gating, sensory integration, and somatosensory representation contribute to dystonic expression across multiple levels of the neuraxis, with potential implications for therapeutic targeting.

Indexed as

Afferent gatingDystoniaPeripheral sensory afferentsProprioceptionSensorimotor integrationSensory tricks

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.