Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709150›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026

Remote coaching with blood flow restriction training: impact on strength, body composition, metabolism, and walking energetics in overweight adults.

Tom Citherlet, Sébastien Christe, Améline Cattin, Gustavo R Mota, Grégoire P Millet

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05371119 (Effects of a Physical Activity Program With Partial Vascular Occlusion on Body Composition, Biomechanics and Walking Energy in Overweight Sedentary Subjects), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05371119 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of a Physical Activity Program With Partial Vascular Occlusion on Body Composition, Biomechanics and Walking Energy in Overweight Sedentary Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LausanneRan2022 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsOverweightArmsExercise Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tom CitherletInstitute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne, Synathlon, office 3224, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. Tom.Citherlet@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-4492-0227
Sébastien ChristeInstitute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne, Synathlon, office 3224, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Améline CattinInstitute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne, Synathlon, office 3224, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gustavo R MotaInstitute of Health Sciences, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.
Grégoire P MilletInstitute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne, Synathlon, office 3224, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBlood flow restriction (BFR) is a widely used exercise modality in sport; however, evidence supporting its use in individuals with overweight remains limited. This study evaluated whether home-based BFR training provides additional benefits over conventional resistance training in this population.

methodsTwenty-seven participants were assigned to BFR (n = 13) or non-BFR (n = 14) groups for a 6-week (3x/week) home-based strength program via videoconference. Assessments included body composition (DEXA), glucose and lipid metabolism, knee extensor/flexor strength, and gait analysis (energetics, biomechanics and preferred walking speed).

resultsNo group × time interactions were observed for any outcome, indicating no BFR-induced benefits. Across both groups, trunk lean mass increased (BFR: 27.2 ± 4.3 to 27.9 ± 4.5 kg; non-BFR: 25.4 ± 4.0 to 25.8 ± 4.4 kg; P = 0.007). HDL-cholesterol decreased (P = 0.008) and glycated haemoglobin increased (P < 0.001), both statistically significant but clinically negligible and directionally unfavourable. Isometric knee-extension peak torque increased (BFR: 186 ± 50 to 222 ± 80 Nm; non-BFR: 183 ± 81 to 204 ± 90 Nm; P < 0.001), with parallel gains in isokinetic concentric extension and flexion at 30°/s, 90°/s, and 180°/s (all P ≤ 0.032). Gait analysis showed no changes.

conclusionSix weeks of remotely supervised bodyweight resistance training improved knee extensor and flexor strength in sedentary adults with overweight or obesity. Under the present conditions, adding BFR did not provide evidence of additional benefit for strength, body composition, metabolic markers, or walking outcomes.

trial registrationThe trial was registered in advance at ClinicalTrials.gov with the identifier NCT05371119 on 12 May 2022.

Indexed as

Fat massGaitKAATSULean massObesityResistance training

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.