Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42709071›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026

[Patient management and personal responsibility as part of a statutory health insurance reform: possible approaches for Germany].

Andreas Beivers, Annette Höhmann

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andreas BeiversFachbereich Wirtschaft & Medien, Hochschule Fresenius, Infanteriestraße 11a, 80797, München, Deutschland. beivers@hs-fresenius.de.
Annette HöhmannFachbereich Wirtschaft & Medien, Hochschule Fresenius, Im Mediapark 4d, 50670, Köln, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the precarious financial situation of Germany's statutory health insurance system (GKV), the introduction of a primary care physician system, in which patients first consult a general practitioner and are referred to a specialist if necessary, is currently the subject of intense debate. The aim is better coordination of care and an overall increase of efficiency in the healthcare system.This discussion paper examines the extent to which a primary care physician system can serve as a key component of a fundamental transformation of the healthcare system and identifies the systemic prerequisites for this. In addition to examining other European countries, the paper also discusses experiences from Germany and offers recommendations. It explores a redefinition of personal responsibility as well as the potential of incentive systems for the sustainable establishment of such a system. Bonus programs modeled after successful loyalty schemes could offer an opportunity to design patient management in a way that is effective, accepted, and socially balanced.Patient management is not a matter of discipline, but of system design. A transformation of the statutory health insurance system that integrates patient management and a modern definition of personal responsibility strengthens not only economic efficiency but also solidarity. Patient management and personal responsibility are not moral appeals, but economic necessities. A solidarity-based system remains stable only if it is efficiently organized.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformNational Health ProgramsPatient ParticipationPrimary Health CareGermanyHumansHealth economicsIncentive systemsPatient managementPersonal responsibilityPrimary care system

Identifiers

PMID42709071
PMCPMC13623797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.