ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026
Ultrafine Airborne Particle Deposition and Clearance in an Avian Lung under Ecologically Relevant Conditions.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Air pollutants, such as particulate matter, are known to contribute to disease in humans, but their impact on wildlife remains understudied. A contributing factor to this health impact is the fraction of inhaled particles depositing in the respiratory system. Compared to humans, birds are equipped with a very different respiratory system, which may render them more or less susceptible to air pollution. Although evidence for adverse pollution effects in birds has emerged, little is known about particle dynamics inside the avian lungs. To elucidate this, we exposed zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) to ambient-like ultrafine model particles under controlled conditions and quantified deposition in the lungs and, in a smaller subset, also the heart, liver and red blood cells. Birds were exposed to 50 or 100 nm particles at air temperatures of 5 or 25 °C, all of which fall within environmentally relevant exposure conditions. Lung deposition was highest for the smallest particles, in line with the size dependence of particle diffusion rate. While deposited fraction in the lung remained unaffected, deposited dose rate (DR) increased at the lower temperature, indicating that the effect was driven solely by elevated minute ventilation (oxygen consumption). Particle clearance measurements 2 weeks after exposure revealed that 44% of the initially deposited 100 nm particles remained in the avian lungs. We found no evidence that particles translocated to the heart, liver or red blood cells in the analyzed subsets. These findings provide an ecologically relevant foundation for understanding particle exposure dynamics in an avian model and support future work assessing health effects of particulate pollution in birds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.