Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42708863›Full record

ReviewPhysiological research2026

Shaping the Future Plate: Exploring the Safety Concerns of Cultivated and Conventional Meat Production.

Petra Neveceralova, Hana Raschmanova, Peter Gorilak, Jan Cerny

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Petra NeveceralovaBeneMeat Technologies, Kamenice, Czech Republic.
Hana Raschmanova
Peter Gorilak
Jan Cerny

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the growing global population and the unsustainable nature of current livestock agriculture, cultivated meat (CM) offers a promising alternative protein source. CM, produced through advanced tissue engineering techniques, aims to mitigate health, ethical, and environmental issues associated with conventional meat. This review evaluates the safety of CM consumption, comparing its risks and benefits to those of traditional meat. CM presents numerous advantages, including the reduction of zoonotic diseases and antibiotic resistance. However, it also introduces new challenges, such as genetic modification concerns and whether the CM can cause any kind of disease of affluence. The review highlights the necessity for rigorous safety assessments and regulatory frameworks to ensure CM's safe integration into the food supply. Additionally, CM production's lower environmental impact, such as low greenhouse gas emissions or reduced land and water use make it a viable solution to global food security and environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

AgricultureFood SafetyFood SupplyMeatAnimalsHumansIn Vitro Meat

Identifiers

PMID42708863
PMCPMC13580683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.