ArticleAnalytical chemistry2026
Machine Learning-Enhanced LC-HRMS Workflows for Suspect and Nontargeted Screening of Pesticide Residues in Fruits and Vegetables.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analytical methodologies are essential for detecting and quantifying contaminants. While methods for known compounds are well established, identifying unexpected or unknown compounds remains challenging due to the lack of reference data. Several strategies have been proposed to integrate analytical information into data analysis workflows, but their implementation often requires programming skills and results are rarely presented in a format familiar to analytical chemists, such as the uncertainty budgets used in quantitative analysis. We developed an integrated workflow for suspect screening and nontargeted identification of pesticides in fruits and vegetables using QuEChERS extraction and HPLC-ESI-HRMS (Orbitrap) analysis. The workflow was developed using variable data-independent acquisition (vDIA) data and evaluates protonated and deprotonated species for compound identification. The workflow estimates missing identification properties using machine learning and combines their contributions into a single confidence value. Validation with fortified matrix extracts at different mass concentrations and with real samples containing pesticide residues showed performance comparable to existing software, particularly improving nontargeted identification at high concentrations (>6% increase in identified compounds). This approach reduces the input required for suspect screening and estimates properties for candidate compounds in nontargeted analysis. Results are reported with explicit consideration of the influence of identification properties, analogous to uncertainty budgets in chemical metrology. This workflow improves the interpretability and reliability of chemical identification and supports data-driven decision-making in routine analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.