ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
MolCryst-MLIPs: A Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials Database for Molecular Crystals.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present an open Molecular Crystal (MC) database of Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials (MLIPs) called MolCryst-MLIPs. The first release comprises fine-tuned MACE models for nine molecular crystal systems─Benzamide, Benzoic acid, Coumarin, Durene, Isonicotinamide, Nicotinic acid, Niacinamide, Pyrazinamide, and Resorcinol─developed using the Automated Machine Learning Pipeline (AMLP), which streamlines the entire MLIP development workflow, from reference data generation to model training and validation, into a reproducible and user-friendly pipeline. Models are fine-tuned from the MACE-MH-1 foundation model (omol head), yielding a mean energy MAE of 0.141 kJ·mol-1·atom-1 and a mean force MAE of 0.648 kJ·mol-1·Å-1 across all systems. Benchmarked against three state-of-the-art foundation models on the DFT-labeled polymorph set, only the fine-tuned models reliably identify the most stable polymorph, with a mean Kendall τ = 0.397 indicating a moderate rank correlation with the full DFT landscape. Dynamical stability and structural integrity, as assessed through energy conservation, P2 orientational order parameters, and radial distribution functions, are evaluated using molecular dynamics simulations. The released models and data sets constitute a growing open database of validated MLIPs, ready for production MD simulations of molecular crystal polymorphism across the polymorphic landscape of each target compound under different thermodynamic conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.