ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
Data-Efficient and Fast Machine Learning Molecular Dynamics through Integrated Active Learning and Knowledge Distillation.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We develop data-efficient machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) for fast molecular dynamics simulations by combining DeePMD and MACE models within an active learning and knowledge distillation framework. Using liquid water as a case study, we first independently train DeePMD and MACE models from scratch through active learning. We find that MACE requires around 3 times less training data than DeePMD, but its inference speed is 10 times lower. We also show that starting from a pretrained foundation model based on the MACE architecture further reduces the training data by a factor of 7, resulting in a fine-tuned foundation model with a 25 times data reduction compared to DeePMD. To overcome the limitation associated with the lower inference speed of MACE potentials, we next develop a knowledge distillation scheme to train a DeePMD potential from the fine-tuned foundation model through an inexpensive active learning workflow. The distilled model is generated with ∼10 times less computer time than the DeePMD model trained from scratch, while showing the same fast inference speed. Comparison with ab initio calculations shows that all the models reach the same level of accuracy in reproducing structural, vibrational, and diffusive properties of liquid water. Our approach enables practical, data-efficient training of customized MLIPs with high speed and accuracy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.