ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
Enhanced Line Search Improves Robustness and Efficiency of Pose Sampling in Protein-Ligand Docking.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physics-based protein-ligand docking critically depends on efficient pose sampling, yet established sampling and local refinement algorithms can be inefficient and unstable in the highly nonconvex energy landscapes characteristic of protein-ligand interactions. To address this limitation, we introduce an enhanced local optimization strategy based on curved line search (CLS) and integrate it into AutoDock Vina, resulting in Vina_CLS. The proposed method enables more flexible step-size selection during local refinement and improves convergence in challenging regions of the energy landscape. Across benchmarks on the PDBbind refined set and the LEADS-PEP data set, Vina_CLS consistently outperforms the baseline, exhibiting greater robustness by solving more docking problems, as well as improved efficiency through reduced function and gradient evaluations and shorter runtimes. These gains translate into practical benefits, including more frequent identification of difficult-to-access local minima, enhanced redocking accuracy, and increased recovery of near-native poses. Together, these results demonstrate that improved local optimization can substantially enhance docking performance, highlighting an important, underexplored opportunity to advance structure-based drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.