Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42708679›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026

Enhanced Line Search Improves Robustness and Efficiency of Pose Sampling in Protein-Ligand Docking.

Leo Gaskin, Matthias Welsch, Johannes Kirchmair, Morteza Kimiaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leo GaskinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna1090, Austria.
Matthias WelschDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna1090, Austria.ORCID 0009-0007-9443-895X
Johannes KirchmairDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna1090, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2667-5877
Morteza KimiaeiFaculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, Vienna1090, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/PAT2747625BASF NABoehringer Ingelheim NABundesministerium f?r Arbeit und Wirtschaft NAChristian Doppler Forschungsgesellschaft NAChristian Doppler Laboratory for Molecular Informatics in the Biosciences, University of Vienna NA?sterreichische Nationalstiftung f?r Forschung, Technologie und Entwicklung NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physics-based protein-ligand docking critically depends on efficient pose sampling, yet established sampling and local refinement algorithms can be inefficient and unstable in the highly nonconvex energy landscapes characteristic of protein-ligand interactions. To address this limitation, we introduce an enhanced local optimization strategy based on curved line search (CLS) and integrate it into AutoDock Vina, resulting in Vina_CLS. The proposed method enables more flexible step-size selection during local refinement and improves convergence in challenging regions of the energy landscape. Across benchmarks on the PDBbind refined set and the LEADS-PEP data set, Vina_CLS consistently outperforms the baseline, exhibiting greater robustness by solving more docking problems, as well as improved efficiency through reduced function and gradient evaluations and shorter runtimes. These gains translate into practical benefits, including more frequent identification of difficult-to-access local minima, enhanced redocking accuracy, and increased recovery of near-native poses. Together, these results demonstrate that improved local optimization can substantially enhance docking performance, highlighting an important, underexplored opportunity to advance structure-based drug discovery.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationProteinsAlgorithmsLigandsProtein BindingLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID42708679
PMCPMC13564355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.