ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Diagnostic yield and impact of internal transcribed spacer sequencing from clinical specimens on antifungal management in patients with suspected fungal infection.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing has been increasingly used for the diagnosis of fungal infection. However, data on its real-world clinical utility are limited. We retrospectively evaluated the diagnostic yield from direct clinical specimens using the final diagnosis as the gold standard, and studied the impact of ITS sequencing on antifungal management in a university hospital with an unrestricted order setting. A total of 315 specimens were collected from 227 patients between November 2023 and April 2024. Of these, 59 (18.7%) were from fungal infection cases. ITS sequencing demonstrated a sensitivity of 35.6% and specificity of 96.9%. Agreement with fungal culture was 79.7% (κ = 0.583). In our setting, the median turnaround time of the positive results was 12 (12-14) days. ITS sequencing altered clinical management in only 2 patients (0.9%). The culture-negative but ITS sequencing-positive specimens mostly represented colonizers from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. In an unrestricted setting, ITS sequencing showed low sensitivity and minimal impact on clinical decision-making. To maximize diagnostic benefit and utility, implementation of diagnostic stewardship is necessary. IMPORTANCE: This study provides a real-life evaluation of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing in an unrestricted clinical setting. We demonstrated fair sensitivity and minimal impact on antifungal alteration. We identified critical implementation barriers, including prolonged turnaround times and the frequent detection of colonizers, which fail to guide acute decision-making. These findings are vital for informing hospital policy and advocating for strict diagnostic stewardship to maximize clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.