ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Simulating Partial Conduction Delays in VEPs Via Asynchronous and Contrast-Modulated Stimulation.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the origin of P100 double peaks occasionally observed in patients with optic neuritis by experimentally inducing timing asynchronies between visual field locations and modulating stimulus strength via contrast reduction in transient and steady-state VEPs (trVEP and ssVEP). Methods: The trVEPs and ssVEPs were recorded using a checkerboard stimulus vertically split into nasal and temporal half-fields. Timing asynchrony was induced by delaying the temporal half-field by 24, 35, or 47 ms; stimulus strength was modulated by reducing the temporal half-field contrast to 20% or 8%. Full-field and half-field responses were quantitatively analyzed and qualitatively compared to characterize the superposition effects induced by these stimulus changes. Results: In trVEPs, contrast reduction produced smaller, broader P100 responses with modest peak-time delays and only sporadic double-peak formation. Conversely, induced temporal half-field delays robustly generated P100 double peaks (incidence: 50% at 24 ms, 85% at 35 ms, and 100% at 47 ms). Quantitative and qualitative analyses demonstrated that the P100 peaks of the half-field responses aligned temporally with the two peaks of the full-field double peak. In ssVEPs, increasing delays reduced the absolute harmonic magnitude and altered the second-to-first harmonic ratio (decreased at 24 and 35 ms; increased at 47 ms). Conclusions: Spatially localized timing asynchronies reliably reproduce double-peaked P100 morphologies, supporting differential conduction speeds within the optic nerve as a plausible mechanism in patients with optic neuritis. Translational Relevance: Linking experimentally induced conduction-delay effects to VEP morphology enhances the clinical interpretation of atypical VEP waveforms in suspected optic neuritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.