ArticleJournal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society2026
Definitions of Person-Centeredness for Persons With Dementia in the United States: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multilevel Conceptualization and Measurement of Person-Centeredness.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Person-centeredness first emerged as a concept in dementia care in the 1980s. Nearly 40 years later, it has no universal definition, which limits operationalization and implementation of care and supportive services, measures, interventions, policy, and regulation for people with dementia. Thus, a scoping review of the current definitions of person-centeredness in US dementia care was conducted. Of the 71 included studies, there was considerable variability in elements/themes, complexity, and cited theories; the most common themes were needs and preferences, relationships, and personhood, all of which were present in at least half of the studies' definitions. Importantly, more than 150 articles that were reviewed did not contain a definition, despite including the term in their titles or abstracts. Further investigation in pursuit of a more nuanced conceptualization of person-centeredness that includes these key themes, while also addressing concerns about applicability to diverse cultures and contexts (e.g., organizations and systems), is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.