ArticlePain research & management2026
Application of Pain Management After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Article in Pain research & management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designBibliometric analysis.
objectiveTo optimize pain management and identify future research trends through bibliometric analysis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative lumbar spine pain is multifactorial and often persists despite successful surgery, reducing patients' quality of life, increasing healthcare use, and increasing the risks of opioid dependence and psychological distress.
methodsData from eligible studies were extracted through a comprehensive search and various analyses, including descriptive bibliometrics, citations, keywords, and thematic analyses. Group comparisons were made between Asian and non-Asian groups to assess differences and trends between the two regions.
resultsBetween 1984 and 2025, 197 studies were published, with an average annual increase of 1.70%. At least 10 studies were contributed by the USA, Turkey, Iran, China, and Korea. Studies from the USA had the highest annual citations, whereas those from Spain had the highest citations per article. The focus of most studies (96.45%) was on pharmacological interventions, including anesthetics, opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antipyretic-analgesic drugs, corticosteroids, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, nonopioid centrally acting analgesics, and nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers. Among these, intravenous administration was used in 48.22% of the studies, and 58.38% employed a placebo as the control. Additionally, 77.16% of the studies used the Visual Analog Scale to assess pain. Overall, the field has shifted from basic pain management to more personalized and multifaceted perioperative strategies, especially for patients undergoing complex spinal surgeries. Significant differences were observed between the Asian and non-Asian groups regarding publication year and age.
conclusionsThe number of randomized controlled trials on lumbar postoperative pain has increased, with the USA, Turkey, Iran, and Korea dominating the research. China's lower citation ranking was lower on citation-based indicators; limited international visibility is proposed as a hypothesis for this pattern rather than an established explanation. Driven by the opioid crisis, the field has evolved from opioid-sparing strategies to multimodal, personalized care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.