Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42708442›Full record

ArticleActa otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale2026

The effect of hearing loss above 2 kHz on temporal resolution and speech understanding in noise.

Büşra Gökçe, Rabia Aygün, Zahra Polat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Büşra GökçeFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Audiology, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
Rabia AygünFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Zahra PolatHamidiye Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Audiology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate temporal resolution, speech understanding in noise, and daily communication difficulties in individuals with sensorineural hearing loss above 2 kHz. Method: Thirty adults aged 38-59 years with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss (HF-SNHL) were included as the study group, and 30 individuals aged 37-59 years with normal hearing as the control group. Participants completed the Gap Detection, Random Gap Detection, Turkish Matrix Test (TMT), and the Speech, Spatial Perception, and Hearing Quality (SSQ) scale. Statistical comparisons and decision-tree analyses were conducted. Results: Significant differences between groups were observed in temporal resolution tests, speech recognition thresholds (SRT), and speech intelligibility percentages in -5 dB signal to noise ratio condition of the TMT, as well as in SSQ results. Decision-tree analysis indicated that the Speech Perception subscale of the SSQ and the TMT SRT in noise procedure were considered useful for identifying HF-SNHL. Conclusions: Temporal resolution was found to be reduced, and speech comprehension in noise impaired in individuals with HF-SNHL. The SSQ played a decisive role in identifying individuals with HF-SNHL.

Indexed as

Hearing Loss, High-FrequencyHearing Loss, SensorineuralNoiseSpeech PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime Factorshigh frequency sensorineural hearing lossmatrix testspeech in noisespeech intelligibilityspeech perceptiontemporal resolution

Identifiers

PMID42708442
PMCPMC13549208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.