Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42708370›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2026

A Systematic Review of Worldwide Guidelines, Protocols, and Health Care Standards for Provision of Palliative Care Services in Progressive Neurological Disorders.

Jessica Kaplonyi, Samantha M Loi, Julie C Stout, Jennifer Philip, Rosalie Gebert, Anita M Y Goh

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica KaplonyiFaculty of MDHS, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2290-939X
Samantha M LoiFaculty of MDHS, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4953-4500
Julie C StoutSchool of Psychological Sciences and the Turner Institute for Brain & Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9637-8590
Jennifer PhilipFaculty of MDHS, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3312-0645
Rosalie GebertIndependent Researcher, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0706-7580
Anita M Y GohFaculty of MDHS, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0159-5926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProgressive neurological disorders (PNDs) are life-limiting conditions with complex trajectories. PNDs require holistic, person-centred care that responds to the needs of both individuals and their families, including the provision of palliative and end-of-life (EOL) care.

aimsThis systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize existing international guidelines addressing palliative and EOL care in adult PND populations, with particular attention to their quality and scope.

methodsWe searched databases and gray literature sources for guidelines published between January 2013 and February 2026. Thirty-three guidelines were included for review. We appraised guidelines to assess quality and comprehensiveness against the World Health Organization's (WHO) domains of palliative care. We conducted inductive content analysis to identify key themes.

resultsGuidelines predominantly were published from high-income countries and focused on dementia. Overall guideline quality was high. Most addressed physical, psychosocial, and social dimensions of care of the WHO domains; however, spiritual wellbeing was inconsistently addressed. Six interrelated themes emerged: (i) holistic symptom management; (ii) recognition of families and caregivers as partners in care; (iii) early and ongoing communication; (iv) value-aligned decision-making; (v) multidisciplinary team expertise; (vi) navigation of medicolegal complexities.

conclusionFindings indicate broad international consensus on the principles of high-quality palliative care in PND, while highlighting gaps in disease/diagnosis representation, spiritual care, and global equity. Future research could consider the importance of disease-specific guidelines, covering regions and countries from across a range of high-, middle-, and lower-income countries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians caring for people with progressive neurological disorders can draw on the internationally consistent principles identified in this review including early integration of palliative care, proactive and open communication, and recognition of families as partners in care to benchmark and strengthen their practice. Gaps in spiritual wellbeing, condition-specific guidance, clinical supports, and equitable access represent clear targets for workforce education, service development, and health policy advocacy.

Indexed as

Nervous System DiseasesPalliative CarePractice Guidelines as TopicHumansTerminal Careclinical practice guidelinesend‐of‐lifeguidelinepalliative careprogressive neurological diseasesystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID42708370
PMCPMC13551532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.