SynthesisESC heart failure2026
Anaemia and all-cause mortality in contemporary heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%): an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in ESC heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsAnaemia is among the most prevalent comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but pooled prognostic estimates predate the contemporary left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% definition and combine legacy with contemporary cohorts. We quantified the association between World Health Organization (WHO)-defined anaemia and all-cause mortality in HFpEF and tested whether it persists under the stricter ejection-fraction threshold. METHODS AND
resultsFollowing PRISMA 2020 (PROSPERO CRD420251361160), we searched five databases from inception to 2026 and included cohort studies reporting an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for binary WHO-defined anaemia vs all-cause mortality in an ejection fraction-stratified HFpEF population; every estimate was verified against its primary source and screening was duplicated (κ = 1.00 after adjudication). Of 6123 records, 20 studies were included; 17 (109 909 patients; anaemia prevalence 26%-70%; follow-up 12-72 months) contributed to two pre-specified co-primary pools analysed with Paule-Mandel random-effects models and Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman variance correction: a legacy pool (LVEF ≥40%, k = 17) and a contemporary pool (LVEF ≥50%, k = 12). Anaemia was associated with higher all-cause mortality in both: aHR 1.49 (95% CI 1.35-1.66; 95% prediction interval (PI) 1.07-2.09; I2 = 85%) in the ≥40% pool and 1.41 (1.26-1.57; PI 1.06-1.87; I2 = 83%) in the ≥50% pool, both PIs excluding the null. The estimate was stable across 12 pre-specified sensitivity analyses (range 1.45-1.52) with no influential study. Across four Bayesian priors, the posterior median aHR was 1.39-1.49 with posterior probability of harm ≥.999, and a robust Bayesian model-average that entertains null, homogeneity, and publication-bias models returned aHR 1.41 (95% credible interval 1.17-1.58). Although small-study effects were detected (Egger P = .03), the bias-corrected estimate was essentially unchanged (PEESE aHR 1.39). A per-1 g/dL lower-haemoglobin dose-response meta-analysis (k = 6) yielded aHR 1.17 (1.08-1.27). The accrued sample exceeded the diversity-adjusted required information size, and GRADE certainty was moderate under the prognostic-factor framework.
conclusionsWHO-defined anaemia is independently associated with a ∼40-50% higher all-cause mortality in HFpEF, preserved under the contemporary LVEF ≥50% definition and robust to extensive sensitivity, Bayesian, and bias-correction analyses. These findings support incorporating anaemia into HFpEF risk assessment and motivate mortality-powered trials in rigorously defined HFpEF, while not implying that anaemia correction improves outcomes. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD420251361160.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42708239What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.