ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Programmed ventricular stimulation for risk stratification in symptomatic athletes with nonischemic left ventricular scar and preserved ejection fraction.
Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsNon-ischaemic left ventricular (LV) scar is increasingly recognized in athletes with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and may represent a substrate for malignant ventricular arrhythmias. The role of electrophysiological study (EPS) with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) for risk stratification in this population remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of inducibility at EPS in symptomatic athletes with non-ischaemic LV scar and preserved LVEF. METHODS AND
resultsWe prospectively enrolled 72 consecutive athletes (mean age 48.9 ± 13.1 years; 66.7% male) with documented non-ischaemic LV scar, preserved LVEF (≥50%), and arrhythmic symptoms (tachycardic palpitations, syncope/presyncope, and/or exercise-related ventricular arrhythmias) undergoing EPS. Inducibility was defined as sustained ventricular arrhythmias during PVS. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major arrhythmic events (MAE), including sudden cardiac death, sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Twenty-three athletes (31.9%) were inducible (EPS+), while 49 (68.1%) were non-inducible (EPS-). Baseline characteristics were largely comparable between groups, although QRS duration was longer in inducible athletes (104.6 ± 15.2 ms vs. 95.5 ± 14.3 ms; P = 0.019). Twenty-three inducible athletes underwent ICD implantation (18 transvenous and 5 subcutaneous devices), whereas 16 non-inducible athletes received an implantable loop recorder. During a median follow-up of 42 months, 11 major arrhythmic events occurred. Nine events occurred among inducible athletes and consisted of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (monomorphic VT, polymorphic VT, or ventricular fibrillation) successfully terminated by appropriate ICD therapy, whereas two major arrhythmic events occurred among non-inducible athletes and required successful resuscitation followed by ICD implantation. No arrhythmic deaths occurred during follow-up. Event-free survival at 50 months was 40.6% in inducible athletes and 95.9% in non-inducible athletes (log-rank P < 0.001).
conclusionIn symptomatic athletes with non-ischaemic LV scar and preserved LVEF, inducibility at EPS identifies a subgroup at higher risk of MAE, whereas non-inducibility is associated with a low event rate. EPS may represent a useful adjunctive tool for arrhythmic risk stratification in athletes, particularly in those without conventional high-risk features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.