ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2026
Interpreter use in Nordic paediatric oncology care - a multicentre cross-sectional study.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeTailored, language-appropriate information is fundamental for children and their families in paediatric oncology, influencing both the quality of care and clinical outcomes. Yet, for families who speak another language, interpreter services are not used to the extent necessary to ensure equitable and patient-safe communication. Knowledge about how healthcare professionals (HCPs) (registered nurses [RNs] and medical doctors [MDs]) experience and manage interpreter use is limited. To address this gap, this study aimed to explore the obstacles to interpreter use in Nordic paediatric oncology care and to examine the challenges HCPs experience during interpreter‑mediated conversations. Participants/materials and methods: A cross-sectional multicentre survey study involving 453 RNs and MDs from 20 paediatric oncology centres across the Nordic region. The Communication over Language Barriers Questionnaire was used in each country's majority language. Descriptive and non-parametric analyses were used to summarise and compare the data between countries and professions. Group differences were tested using Pearson's chi-square or Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.
resultsTime constraints in acute but also in planned care situations were identified as the most common obstacles to interpreter use. In addition, when using interpreters, the respondents sometimes or often experienced challenges such as uncertainty about the accuracy of the interpretation and about patients' understanding of the given information.
interpretationTo ensure equitable, safe, and person‑centred care for children and their families, there is an emergent need for improved communication strategies and a need for better organisational support, easier interpreter access, and stronger systems for quality-assured interpreter services across the Nordic region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.