ReviewIndian journal of dermatology
The Potency of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing and Evaluating the Severity of Vitiligo: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Indian journal of dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neural networks (NNs), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), have the ability to assess the severity of vitiligo and improve diagnosis accuracy. In contrast to human physicians' diagnosis, which is primarily based on subjective assessment, standardised and objective diagnostic methods are needed to provide an accurate diagnosis and grade the severity of vitiligo. The aim of this study is to analyse the sensitivity and specificity of AI in vitiligo diagnosis and severity assessment. The PRISMA 2020 protocol was followed to screen literature in several databases: Proquest, PubMed, Taylor and Francis, SAGE, JSTOR, and ScienceDirect. Human studies that investigated the potential of AI in vitiligo diagnosis were included in vitiligo diagnosis were included. Statistical analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.4 and RStudio, and risk of bias tools were used to assess study bias. Certainty of evidence was analysed using GRADE. The systematic review consisted of 15 studies, and seven studies were statistically analysed. The most studied NNs were Inception V3 (n = 2), visual geometry group (n = 2), and ResNet (n = 2). The overall sensitivity ranged from 72.5% to 99.7%, with a pooled sensitivity of 95.5%. Specificity ranged from 72% to 99.9%, with a pooled specificity of 97%. Among the evaluated models, Inception V3 showed the highest diagnostic performance. The summary receiver operating characteristics curve (SROC) from multiple analyses showed an area under the curve of 0.96. AI showed potential in diagnosing and evaluating the severity of vitiligo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.