ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Progress in Intra-Arterial Stem Cell Therapy for Ischemic Stroke: A Review.
Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke kills almost 130 000 Americans each year-that is 1 in every 18 deaths. Until 2015, intravenous thrombolysis was the only approved acute reperfusion therapy available but has several limitations in its application. The last decade has witnessed tremendous advances in acute ischemic stroke therapy, particularly with the widespread use of mechanical thrombectomy as a first-line treatment for patients presenting with acute large vessel occlusion. Mechanical thrombectomy is superior to standard medical care about recanalization and has one of the lowest number-needed-to-treat for disability in all of medicine. Yet, only about 1 in 2 patients with large vessel occlusion stroke achieve functional independence. This is due to several patient factors but ultimately results from cell death and limited ability of the brain for repair. Stem cell therapy as an adjunct to intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke is currently under investigation in both translational and clinical models to improve recovery. Intra-arterial delivery, in particular, has gained attention because clinicians can readily combine it with thrombectomy to directly target the stroke lesion in a minimally invasive manner. In this review, we summarize the current literature on stem cell therapy for stroke, highlighting translational considerations, delivery challenges, and clinical applications, with particular emphasis on the procedural, safety, and practice implications of intra-arterial administration for neurointervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.