Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42708111›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Evaluation of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Hybrid Surgery for Multilevel Cervical Disc Disease.

Bharatkumar R Dave, Arjit Vashishtha, Ajay Krishnan, Shivanand C Mayi, Ravi Ranjan Rai, Mirant B Dave, Mikeson Panthackel, Saurabh S Kulkarni, Yogenkumar Adodariya, Kishan Panjwani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bharatkumar R DaveSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Arjit VashishthaSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Ajay KrishnanSpine Surgery, BIMS, Bhavnagar Institute Of Medical Science, Bhavnagar, IND.
Shivanand C MayiSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Ravi Ranjan RaiSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Mirant B DaveSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Mikeson PanthackelSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Saurabh S KulkarniOrthopedics, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Aurangabad, IND.
Yogenkumar AdodariyaSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Kishan PanjwaniSpine Surgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.
Mukesh PatelNeurosurgery, Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute, Ahmedabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction While dealing with multilevel cervical disc disease, there is no consensus regarding the ideal treatment. Traditionally, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been the time-tested procedure with good outcomes for single-level pathologies, but it is associated with disadvantages, including disruption of the biomechanical environment, increased stresses on adjacent superior and inferior segments during movement, accelerated degeneration, and Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD). Cervical total disc replacement (TDR) has been proposed to prevent this by preserving the range of motion (ROM) at the level of pathology and reducing stresses on adjacent segments. However, as is the case with ACDF, the results of cervical TDR in multilevel cervical disc disease are inconsistent. As different levels are at different degrees of degeneration, hybrid surgery (HS) has been proposed as a combination of ACDF and TDR, which can theoretically preserve cervical spine movements and reduce abnormal loading at adjacent levels, thus preventing the ASD. However, clinical benefits are yet to be proven. Materials and methods We did a retrospective study of 20 patients who underwent HS at Stavya Spine Hospital and Research Institute. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically periodically for a minimum follow-up of two years. Demographic data and intra-operative findings and complications, if any, were noted from the patients' records. Clinical evaluation included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, and modified Japanese Orthopaedics Association (mJOA) score. Radiologically, cervical spine lateral view radiographs were done to assess C2-C7 ROM, adjacent superior and inferior segment ROM, and any evidence of heterotrophic ossification (HO). Results Of the 20 patients included, the mean age was 41.3 ± 7.4 years (range 36-62 years). The mean operative time was 125.8 ± 20.5 minutes, with a mean intraoperative blood loss of 138 ± 62.6 mL. The average follow-up period was 4.6 ± 3.7 years (ranging from 12 to 28 months). All the patients had statistically significant clinical improvement in terms of VAS score, NDI score, and mJOA score. Radiologically, mean C2-C7 ROM was 38.2° ± 9.6°, mean ROM at the superior adjacent segment was 8.2° ± 3.9°, and the inferior adjacent segment was 9.6° ± 4.3°. None of the patients exhibited any evidence of HO. Conclusion HS for multilevel disc disease in the cervical spine is associated with good clinical outcomes in terms of VAS, NDI, and mJOA scores. Radiologically, the benefit of HS is highlighted in terms of preserving the movements at the level of pathology, which reduces abnormal adjacent segment loading and thus potentially reduces the incidence of ASD.

Indexed as

anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (acdf)anterior cervical surgerycervical tdrhybrid cervical surgerymultilevel cervical disc disease

Identifiers

PMID42708111
PMCPMC13549422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.